Monday, January 22, 2007

Things I have been thinking about lately.

Bad Faith:
"A critical claim in existentialist thought is that we are always radically free to make choices and guide our lives towards our own chosen goal (or 'project'). We cannot escape this freedom, even in overwhelming circumstances. For instance, even an armed mugger's victim possesses choices: to hand over his wallet; to negotiate; to beg; to run; to counter-attack; or to die.
Although we are limited by our circumstances (our facticity), these cannot force us, as radically free beings, to follow one course over another. For this reason, we choose in anguish: we know that we must make a choice, that it will have consequences, and that some choices are better than others. But for Sartre, to claim that one amongst our many conscious possibilities takes undeniable precedence (for instance, 'I cannot risk my life, because I must support my family') is to assume the role of an object in the world, merely at the mercy of circumstance - a being-in-itself that is only its own facticity." [Wikipedia]

Human Agency:
"Human agency invests a moral component into a given situation. If a situation is the consequence of human decision making, persons may be under a duty to apply value judgements to the consequences of their decisions, and held to be responsible for those decisions. Human agency entitles the observer to ask 'should this have occurred?' in a way that would be nonsensical in circumstances lacking human decisions-makers, for example, the impact of Shoemaker-Levy into Jupiter." [Wikipedia]

Good Faith:
"Good faith, or in Latin bona fides, is the mental and moral state of honesty, conviction as to the truth or falsehood of a proposition or body of opinion, or as to the rectitude or depravity of a line of conduct, even if the conviction is objectively unfounded. This concept is important in law.
One who acts in good faith, so far as the violation of positive law (or even in certain junctures of natural law) is concerned, is said to labor under an invincible error, and hence to be guiltless. This consideration is frequently applied to determine the degree of right or obligation prevailing in the various forms of human engagements, such as contracts (common law) and the law of obligations (civil law). In fact, good faith has been identified as the key essence of a contract, and the parties are expected to act in good faith in their dealings." [Catholic Dictionary via Wikipedia]

Ideas, ideas for five hours provided solace today. Ideas provide comfort now, maybe to transform into real sentences, paragraphs, illustrations in a span of time. How long? I don't know. What will you say? That today, primate behavior-congress-lobbying-dry minidrifts of snow on cars-hunger-laughs in the hall on the phone-a little gift--this is life. Ah, this is life.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The things about which you think can be described as having been strung together as a series of multiple clauses, both dependent and independent, in relation to each other, suggesting to me that your capability to elucidate a complex and isolated thought far exceeds that of mine.

I'm not making fun of you. ;) It's just nice to see that others are giving credit to the metaphysical, so I thought I'd comment.